top of page
嵌套序列 01_3.gif
Anchor 1

NOTHING

NOTHING

NOTHING

I always habitually attempt to define what I perceive and look for images or words that match them in our minds to align them with subjective cognition. But the concept of "nothing" is so contradictory. If you try to define it, it's turn out to be a paradox like what Francis Mckee wrote: "each attempt to consider the idea of nothing reveals yet another 'thing' or 'entity'" . In the scene of being at the funeral of a loved one, or perhaps in a daze in the night sky, the indescribable sense of loss is the closest experience to "nothing" that I can retrieve in my memory. I was always unconsciously leaning "nothing" towards a particular event with carrying some mood or atmosphere. Nevertheless, I did not know that "nothing" has become "something" at the moment when the thought flows.

 

NOTHING

NOTHING

NOTHING

NOTHING

1f2a91f8ed384fab95ee7ff5a61a2a48.PNG
Anchor 2
d1.png

When my cognition is involved in developing things, they have been placed into a structure that allows me to understand easily. The knowledge formed by the "names" learned in the past constitutes an invisible frame for the world I saw. Even if I am just a tiny creature live on a small planet in the vast universe, this little nest of knowledge appears so unbreakable in daily life. In September 1977, Andy Warhol held an exhibition of his collection of American folk art that he called "Folk and Funk" at the New York Museum of American Folk Art. In an interview with the New York Times, he stated that his favourite design was an eighteenth-century pale blue door and doorframe. He said: "I like the door best... You can go in and out of it and still go nowhere."  This is a very humorous answer, but it also reveals that people are meaning makers -- they use walls and doors to divide the space into rooms with different meanings.

 
Anchor 3
Dj98_PhXcAIAlZN.jpg
Anchor 4
01.gif

I convert cognition into names and then use the known names to understand new things and generate more meanings (knowledge) in this cycle. Whether it is a physical door frame, or a conceptual rule or morality, the name is an adequate grip for dividing distinctions, maintaining social order and inheritance. It is a subjective symbolization of people's collective identification with objective existence. However, due to each person's different point of view, the same things have very diverse meanings. Because "one's knowledge of the history behind something affects one's thinking about that thing", meaninglessness also becomes a very subjective state. When I was staring at the sky late at night, the sparse stars cannot recall any memory in my mind. I just dwelt my mind in the midst of the depth of black, and this serene atmosphere made me vaguely feel the nothingness. But perhaps at the exact moment, astronomers were also observing that part of the sky and the stars got different names, revolution cycles and galaxies in their eyes.  The distant horizon seems so blank to me, and the vast universe is hanging beyond the dome of my knowledge. Even though I often look at the sky, I still cannot read the other stories of the stars hidden in the night.

Anchor 5
d2.png
bottom of page